The Read
three league signals
| 41% | ▁▄▅█ |
| 70 | ██▄▂▁▁▃▁ |
| 4 | █▄▄▃▂▁▄▁ |
Trend vs Price
where the number and the market disagree
1. Daniel Jones Market Trails Passing Trend
| The trend | Jones’ recent passing work points upward: his weighted form is 243 yards, while his last 8 sit at 248. The dome adds another favorable piece for a quarterback whose recent production already clears the market’s expectation. |
| The price | The market posts 234.2 passing yards against our number of 272.9. |
| The lean | Lean over Jones’ passing yards. |
2. Kimani Vidal Workload Clashes With Market
| The trend | Vidal owns the top backfield position, and 57 rushing attempts over the last 4 games support the possibility of volume. The concern is how the carries are divided: recent backfield competition pulls his outlook down despite that starting role. |
| The price | The market asks for 53.3 rushing yards, while our number is 32.1. |
| The lean | Lean under Vidal’s rushing yards. |
3. Mason Taylor Role Outruns Production
| The trend | Taylor’s lead depth-chart position and recent target competition give him a route to steady involvement. Production has not followed, however, with 29.7 receiving yards across his last 8 forming the strongest drag on the projection. |
| The price | The market sits at 40.5 receiving yards versus our number of 23.9. |
| The lean | Lean under Taylor’s receiving yards. |
The Slate
every game · one line of intel
| Matchup | Kickoff | Line | Implied |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIN @ LAC | Thu 8:15 | LAC -3 · 44.5 | MIN 20.75 · LAC 23.75 |
| Thursday opens with LAC -3 and both teams implied above 20 points. | |||
| BUF @ CAR | Sun 1:00 | BUF -7.5 · 47 | BUF 27.25 · CAR 19.75 |
| Buffalo carries a 27.25-point team total as a -7.5 road favorite. | |||
| CHI @ BAL | Sun 1:00 | BAL -2.5 · 45 | CHI 21.25 · BAL 23.75 |
| BAL -2.5 makes this one of the slate’s tightly priced games. | |||
| CLE @ NE | Sun 1:00 | NE -7 · 40.5 | CLE 16.75 · NE 23.75 |
| Cleveland’s 16.75 implied points help hold the total to 40.5. | |||
| MIA @ ATL | Sun 1:00 | ATL -7 · 44.5 | MIA 18.75 · ATL 25.75 |
| Atlanta is -7 with 25.75 implied points; Miami sits at 18.75. | |||
| NYG @ PHI | Sun 1:00 | PHI -7.5 · 44 | NYG 18.25 · PHI 25.75 |
| Philadelphia pairs a -7.5 spread with a 25.75-point team total. | |||
| NYJ @ CIN | Sun 1:00 | CIN -6.5 · 44.5 | NYJ 19 · CIN 25.5 |
| Cincinnati is -6.5 and carries 25.5 implied points against New York. | |||
| SF @ HOU | Sun 1:00 | HOU -2 · 42 | SF 20 · HOU 22 |
| HOU -2 and a 42 total signal little separation and modest scoring. | |||
| TB @ NO | Sun 4:05 | TB -3.5 · 45.5 | TB 24.5 · NO 21 |
| Tampa Bay is -3.5 with 24.5 implied points in New Orleans. | |||
| DAL @ DEN | Sun 4:25 | DEN -3.5 · 51.5 | DAL 24 · DEN 27.5 |
| The 51.5 total and Denver’s 27.5 implied points headline the late window. | |||
| TEN @ IND | Sun 4:25 | IND -15 · 47.5 | TEN 16.25 · IND 31.25 |
| Indianapolis is -15 with a 31.25-point team total; Tennessee sits at 16.25. | |||
| GB @ PIT | Sun 8:20 | GB -2.5 · 46 | GB 24.25 · PIT 21.75 |
| Green Bay is a -2.5 road favorite in a game totaled at 46. | |||
| WSH @ KC | Mon 8:15 | KC -10.5 · 47.5 | WSH 18.5 · KC 29 |
| Kansas City closes the week at -10.5 with 29 implied points. | |||
The Board
every call · our number vs the market
How to read it: the grey track is the realistic range for each call. The dot is our number, the black tick is the market line, and the connector between them is the disagreement — green when we lean over, amber when we lean under.
Passing Yards |
|||||||
| 1 · Daniel Jones IND · vs TEN | OVER +38.7 | ||||||
|
234.2
272.9
155.4
409.1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 2 · C.J. Stroud HOU · vs SF | OVER +33.9 | ||||||
|
200.5
234.4
120.9
347.6
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 3 · Dillon Gabriel CLE · vs NE | UNDER -26 | ||||||
|
201.3
175.3
23
285.6
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 4 · Jalen Hurts PHI · vs NYG | OVER +23.9 | ||||||
|
209.7
233.6
138.4
372
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 5 · Dak Prescott DAL · vs DEN | OVER +16.3 | ||||||
|
252.2
268.5
155.8
392.6
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Rushing Yards |
|||||||
| 6 · Bijan Robinson ATL · vs MIA | UNDER -32.5 | ||||||
|
89.2
56.7
21.3
170
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 7 · Derrick Henry BAL · vs CHI | UNDER -32.2 | ||||||
|
88.7
56.5
20.2
161.1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 8 · Saquon Barkley PHI · vs NYG | UNDER -30.5 | ||||||
|
80.5
50
16.7
145.5
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 9 · Christian McCaffrey SF · vs HOU | UNDER -25.6 | ||||||
|
67
41.4
16.7
121
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 10 · J.K. Dobbins DEN · vs DAL | UNDER -21.6 | ||||||
|
72.8
51.2
15.9
145.9
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 11 · Kimani Vidal LAC · vs MIN | UNDER -21.2 | ||||||
|
53.3
32.1
3.7
115.1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 12 · Jonathan Taylor IND · vs TEN | UNDER -20.7 | ||||||
|
100.2
79.5
30.4
183.1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 13 · Alvin Kamara NO · vs TB | UNDER -17.7 | ||||||
|
50.2
32.5
4.9
120.1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 14 · Josh Jacobs GB · vs PIT | UNDER -14 | ||||||
|
66.3
52.3
26
118.5
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 15 · Jaylen Warren PIT · vs GB | UNDER -12 | ||||||
|
55.8
43.8
15.3
116.1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Receiving Yards |
|||||||
| 16 · Emeka Egbuka TB · vs NO | UNDER -17.4 | ||||||
|
76.3
58.9
4.9
145.7
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 17 · Justin Jefferson MIN · vs LAC | UNDER -16.8 | ||||||
|
79.3
62.5
10.5
140.5
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 18 · Mason Taylor NYJ · vs CIN | UNDER -16.6 | ||||||
|
40.5
23.9
0.7
79.3
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 19 · Drake London ATL · vs MIA | OVER +16 | ||||||
|
62.5
78.5
16.1
180.8
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 20 · Keon Coleman BUF · vs CAR | UNDER -15.1 | ||||||
|
43.7
28.6
0
98.6
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 21 · Matthew Golden GB · vs PIT | UNDER -14.8 | ||||||
|
41.8
27
0
99.5
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 22 · DK Metcalf PIT · vs GB | UNDER -14.3 | ||||||
|
59.5
45.2
1.6
121.5
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 23 · Cade Otton TB · vs NO | UNDER -12.9 | ||||||
|
40.5
27.6
1
85.7
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 24 · Khalil Shakir BUF · vs CAR | UNDER -12.4 | ||||||
|
48.5
36.1
2.4
99.4
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| 25 · Ja'Marr Chase CIN · vs NYJ | UNDER -10.8 | ||||||
|
87.5
76.7
11.8
151.5
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Last Week
28–12
Best call: Jalen Coker under 28 rec yds — The number closed at 24.3 and he finished with 0. Covered ✓
All 40 calls counted, published or not: 28–12, and we beat the closing number on 70% of them.
Film Room Session
Romeo Doubs · GB · WR
Romeo Doubs has become Green Bay’s clearest role-consolidation story, commanding 41% of the air yards and 21% of the red-zone targets. His 75% catch rate shows that the added opportunity is becoming usable production, while 2.1 yards of separation helps explain how he is finishing those chances.
| Share of air yards | 41% | How much of the team's downfield work runs through him. |
| Red-zone targets | 21% | His share of the throws that become touchdowns. |
| Catch rate | 75% | Of everything thrown his way, what he brings in. |
| Separation | 2.1 yds | Space from the nearest defender at the catch point. |
The film should show whether Doubs is creating that space through route detail or benefiting from coverage structure. The season-long view of his changing role lives in Film Room.
Every number in this issue comes from our reviewed tables — 4 of 8 grading systems ran green this week.
Vantage provides analytical insights for information purposes only. We do not offer or facilitate gambling or wagering. No analysis guarantees outcomes. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please wager responsibly.
